Ikea is going to open it's first store in Winnipeg this week, and though I am an enormous fan of cheap modular furniture, kooky wall art and kitchen gadgets, I just can't bring myself to consider going the first couple months. Even though I actually need furniture. In Vancouver, we used to love going to Ikea, either in Richmond or Coquitlam. And they were both always packed to the gills, any time of the day, any day of the week. In places that are NOT decidedly cheap and bargain crazy like Winnipeg. This city gets on the novelty of a new chain like Lindsay Lohan on her car keys after a bottle of Jack and a half dozen Vicodin. When Swiss Chalet opened back up here again last winter, people were lined up into the parking lot in -20 something weather on a Wednesday night at 9. For chicken. It's....kinda sad.
The Winnipeg Blue Bombers have partnered with the province to produce a media campaign this month for domestic violence awareness. It's a series of videos (my favorite starring my imaginary boyfriend Glen January) aimed at men, encouraging them to look at domestic violence as a men's issue, and not to be passive bystanders where domestic violence exists. I am always appreciative of awareness campaigns that are aimed at those who are the most common perpetrators of crime (usually, but not always, men), not the victims or potential victims (usually, but not always, women). Domestic violence campaigns should be aimed at men and changing patterns of behaviour, not at women telling them how to make escape plans and how to find legal advice (these things are obviously important, but don't fix the root of the problem: a violent individual). Rape campaigns should be aimed at men and recognizing when things have gone too far and consent hasn't been given, not at women telling them to dress like nuns and abstain from alcohol and never let on that they might enjoy their sexuality. This government PSA from England is incredibly difficult to watch, but is also incredibly effective and properly targeted. Accountability for one's own actions is something I think is sorely lacking from the public discourse in regards to these issues.
I love Anthony Bourdain. I don't remember when it started, but it's been going on for years. I've read nearly all his books, I'm an avid follower of his TV shows, both No Reservations and The Layover, and will likely follow him to CNN for his new show there. He's arrogant and rude and often fairly drunk, but he's also earnest and respectful and I have never seen him turn up his nose at something offered to him, no matter what or where. In the episode he spends in Northern Quebec, some Inuit men take him out seal hunting, and when they return with their kill, the whole family sits around the seal on the kitchen floor, they cut into it, and eat it raw. They offer Tony the eyeball, as he is the guest, and he doesn't so much as hesitate. He takes it, pops it in his mouth, swallows and manages not to barf. I have huge admiration for this. However, I was watching the episode he did from the Vietnam central highlands last year, and something about it has stuck right in my craw. He goes to visit some remote hill tribes, still practicing a more traditional way of life. He takes his cameras there, he films whatever he sees. And then proceeds to take issue with the fact that there are other white people there doing the same thing. It went something along the lines of "The American military invaders are long gone, having been replaced by another kind of invader." He then cuts to a shot of white tourists sitting on the floor of a hut, listening to a couple play instruments and sing. Evidently, this particular tribe has been courting the tourist dollar with cultural displays and shows. Tony goes on to say "The tourists come, they spend, they leave. But what do they take with them?", the implication being that tourism is intractably affecting traditional ways of life, and that what the tourists "take with them" is culture and identity. Which it may be. It may not be. But it sounds as though this is a choice the locals have made. They are not obliged to be hospitable or accomodating to tourists, but they are clearly taking steps to promote and solicit it. And is that not their right? Because their "traditional ways of life" have lasted longer than others, are they obligated to maintain them forever, never changing or adapting? And if Mr. Bourdain were truly so concerned with the exposure to outsiders these people are enduring, he might consider doing something besides putting them and their community on international TV. What is he doing besides "coming, spending and leaving"?? Get off your high horse, asshole.
Anyways, that's just about all the ranting I've got in me for tonight. Thank you for reading and have a wonderful week :)
"Learn from yesterday, live for today, hope for tomorrow." - Albert Einstein














